Supreme Court Rejects Bid to Re-Hear Fraudulent ‘Doe v. Bolton’ Abortion Case
Disappointment with new conservative justices - only four out of nine justices would have had to vote to hear case
By Meg Jalsevac
WASHINGTON, October 11, 2006 (LifeSiteNews) – Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court rejected Sandra Cano, ‘Doe’ in the controversial 1973 Doe v. Bolton case, and her bid to have the controversial abortion case reheard.
Doe v. Bolton was decided on January 22, 1973 - the same day as Roe v. Wade, the first landmark abortion case of the United States. Roe allowed for abortion in the first trimester based on a constitutional right to privacy. The Doe case took it a step farther implementing an undefined medical exception – ultimately allowing for abortion up until the moment of birth if necessary for the health of the mother. [Read Entire Story]
By Meg Jalsevac
WASHINGTON, October 11, 2006 (LifeSiteNews) – Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court rejected Sandra Cano, ‘Doe’ in the controversial 1973 Doe v. Bolton case, and her bid to have the controversial abortion case reheard.
Doe v. Bolton was decided on January 22, 1973 - the same day as Roe v. Wade, the first landmark abortion case of the United States. Roe allowed for abortion in the first trimester based on a constitutional right to privacy. The Doe case took it a step farther implementing an undefined medical exception – ultimately allowing for abortion up until the moment of birth if necessary for the health of the mother. [Read Entire Story]
From what I have read is that the case was very iffy legally. Lawyer-commenters at Amy Welborn's think that the legal basis for the suit was laughable.
ReplyDeleteI won't tell you what I think of lawyers here, but most of them are pretty laughable, especially when they try to play God.
ReplyDeleteHow dare you insult my favorite people! Why both Bill and Hillary Clinton were lawyers! LOL!
ReplyDeleteWhere there's a loophole you'll find a lawyer easing his way through -- particularly if it's a pro-life issue.
ReplyDeleteI was around when Doe v. Bolton reared its ugly head.
Catholic Pro-life Attorney